In previous experiments on unconscious thought, information was presented to participants in one continuous session; however, in daily life, information is delivered in a temporally partitioned way. We examined whether unconscious thought could equally integrate temporally scattered information when making overall evaluations. When presenting participants with information in two temporally partitioned sessions, participants’ overall evaluation was based on neither the information in the first session nor that in the second session ; instead, information in both sessions were equally integrated to (...) reach a final judgment. Conscious thought, however, overemphasized information in the second session. Experiments 3 and 4 further ruled out possible influencing factors including differences in the distributions of positive/negative attributes in the first and second sessions and on-line judgment. These findings suggested that unconscious thought can integrate information from a wider range of periods during an evaluation, while conscious thought cannot. (shrink)

本书力图在哲学诠释学与文学诠释学之间建立一种逻辑中介,并系统地阐述文学诠释学的重要问题,以文本、理解与意义为核心概念,在诠释学理解事件中系统地阐释文本与意义之间的内在关系,是本书的中心主题。.

本书力图在哲学诠释学与文学诠释学之间建立一种逻辑中介,并系统地阐述文学诠释学的重要问题,以文本、理解与意义为核心概念,在诠释学理解事件中系统地阐释文本与意义之间的内在关系,是本书的中心主题。.